Disputatio:stannum

Add topic
There are no discussions on this page.

Stannum is declined here like a second declension neuter noun, but Lewis & Short states that it's indeclinable.

Hmm, not in this edition, which clearly gives it as "stannum [...], i, n." (i.e. stann|um, -i, neut., in a format closer to ours). --Mucius Tever 05:00, 26 Octobris 2008 (UTC)
It's also declined here. The a seems to be long, btw. --PeeKoo 20:09, 28 Octobris 2008 (UTC)
Revertere ad "stannum".