Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Kyotum" differant
Content deleted Content added
kiōtō, -ōnis, really? |
|||
Linea 1:
==Kiōto non Kiōtō?==
Hmm... ok, apparently [[Meacum]], a Iaponice [[みやこ]] (''miyako'', [[caput]]). That's fine... But given the patterns of borrowing... ''kyōto'' has a short final o, which means it shouldn't be an -ō, -ōnis word. (If anything I'd expect/prefer either Kiōtum, -i, cf [[w:Kiotium (praefectura)]] or Kiōto ''indecl.'') *sigh* It looks like it's an established word so I can't gripe too much... but is there any precedent for an -ŏ, -ŏnis (or even -ŏ, -ōnis) word, or do we have to have a full declensional assimilation here? —[[Usor:Mycēs|Myces Tiberinus]] 05:05 nov 14, 2004 (UTC)
:It appears in the Blaeu Atlas of 1662 as [[Miaco]]. I can't find evidence for ''Kyotum'' in Latin. The link you've posted to the WP is for the prefecture ''Kiotium'', not for the city. --[[Usor:EncycloPetey|EncycloPetey]] 18:53, 15 Decembris 2008 (UTC)
| |||