Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio Victionarii:Pagina prima" differant

Content deleted Content added
Muke (disputatio | conlationes)
→‎Subpaginae: nova pars
Linea 124:
::But you have "amatus" and [[sum]], so you can make these forms. --[[Usor:Alex1011|Alex1011]] 18:48, 21 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
:::Right, on the individual word pages we want in particular to show the forms of the word itself. Something like "amatus sum" is not a form of the verb 'amo' ''per se'', but a collocation generated by the grammar from the participle and the copula to produce a meaning there is no verb form for. (Compare how the English Wiktionary lists the parts of [[:en:eat|eat]] as ''eats, eating, ate, eaten''—while ''is eating'', ''has eaten'', etc. are not listed.) When we do treat these periphrastic constructions, they would probably go on [[Auxilium:Coniugatio Latina]]. —[[Usor:Muke|Mucius <span style="font-variant:small-caps">Tever</span>]] 04:48, 22 Februarii 2011 (UTC)
 
== Subpaginae ==
 
Cur [http://la.wiktionary.org/wiki/Auxilium:Subpaginae subpaginis] utimur? (vide exempli gratia paginam de verbo ''[[de#Formae_affines|de]]'') Cur non omnia verba idem scripta eadem in pagina ponamus, ut alia faciunt Victionaria? [[Usor:Mattie|Mattie]] 21:46, 11 Aprilis 2011 (UTC)
Return to the project page "Pagina prima".